Having just completed the first proper week of classes I just wanted to write a quick note on the interviews which I went through for different schools.
Firstly for the school which I ended up at, the interview process was very rigorous. Only one interview, but very through, many thoughtful questions, a presentation and an extended discussion about the school, the city and the experience.
After a poor start (I arrived late and flustered) the interview went well, and the interviewer - an alumni from the early nineties - was clearly interested in me, had read my application closely and was keen to know how both how much thought I had put into why I was doing an MBA and how broadly I thought about the world.
Anyway, it was a very detailed, well crafted and well conducted interview which lasted almost three hours.
The other major school I was interviewed for had two interviews. They had much less structure and the interviewers only had my CV as opposed to having my entire application. The focus was on why I wanted to do an MBA and why I wanted to go to this school in particular.
The first interviewer was a very high level person, head of his organization but quite humble and friendly. The interview was good, careful and thoughtful. He was interested in me and quite happy to tell me more about his MBA experience and post MBA career.
The interview went for around an hour and the experience was very positive. It ended with him saying that he would recommend me, even though he wasn’t meant to tell me his decision.
The second interview was another matter. I had to fly to another city for it as there was not enough alumni in my home city. I took a day off work, flew in and took a train to the inner city industrial estate where my interviewer’s office was. The interview itself was pretty poor. The interviewer spent his time looking at my CV - clearly he had not looked at it before. He thought I had flown in from the wrong city, and didn’t seem terribly interested in anything I said. He asked the standard "Why MBA, Why this school?"questions in a totally cursory way, without really listening to my answers. Other questions he asked were pretty irrelevant and unstructured, and were very much backdoor ways for him to tell me how great he was and how little he needed the MBA to further his career. I learnt more about him than he learnt about me.
The whole debacle lasted about half an hour, at the end of which he tore my CV into two in front of me and asked me to show myself out.
I thought I had performed very well, maintaining my politeness, being articulate and engaged in the face of his general arrogance and rudeness, but my overall feeling was that I had wasted my time and money. Moreover, if he was representative of the type of people at the school I wanted no part of it, notwithstanding the more positive experience of the first interview.